Few will argue against the need for reform. The tragic death of Nigerian boxer Gabriel Oluwanreju during a bout in March has thrown the sport’s safety and governance into sharp focus. The Ministerial Commission of Enquiry’s recommendations demand attention and action.

However, how these changes are pursued will determine whether they strengthen or fracture Ghanaian boxing.

The NSA, it must be stressed, is not the governing body for boxing. Its statutory role is oversight, not direct administration. Imposing a leadership change by appointing a Normalisation Committee risks overstepping that boundary, undermining the very structures reforms are supposed to protect.

Last Friday’s meeting between the GBA board, NSA Director-General Yaw Ampofo Ankrah, and ministry representatives ended in deadlock.

The GBA had requested a further three-month extension to finish ongoing work.

Instead, the NSA introduced three consultants, unveiling a five-year development plan to be driven by a Normalisation Committee.

The proposals are ambitious – building regional training centres, staging regular championships, and reshaping the sport’s culture – yet the decision to sideline the GBA’s elected leadership has sparked resistance.

History offers a warning. In 2018, Ghanaian football was placed under a FIFA-backed Normalisation Committee after the dissolution of the Ghana Football Association.

That intervention was meant to reset governance, draft new statutes, and organise fresh elections.

While the committee completed its mandate, football continues to grapple with unintended consequences, including persistent structural and administrative challenges.

The lesson is clear: well-meaning reforms, if imposed without deep stakeholder involvement, can create as many problems as they solve.

A Normalisation Committee suspends democratic processes, replacing elected leaders with appointed managers.

Such a move should only follow a clear and demonstrable governance breakdown – not be the default option in times of disagreement.

The GBA’s stance is that while it supports reform in principle, it is fully capable of delivering change without being dissolved.

That position deserves genuine engagement, not dismissal.

Ghanaian boxing is one of our proudest sporting traditions. It has produced world champions, inspired communities, and brought global recognition to our nation.

The goal should be to preserve its credibility while improving safety, governance, and inclusivity. That requires reforms anchored in dialogue, cooperation, and respect for existing institutions.

The NSA and the ministry must resist the temptation to rush through reforms at the cost of stakeholder trust.

The path forward should be collaborative, not confrontational. If the process feels like a takeover rather than a partnership, the reforms risk being undermined before they even begin.

For boxing’s sake, caution must be the watchword. We cannot afford to repeat football’s mistakes.